Jump directly to the content

Tyson Fury vs Oleksandr Usyk has reportedly landed just inside the top ten most-watched boxing pay-per-views of all time.

According to , Fury vs Usyk generated upwards of $50million (£39.1m) in PPV revenue from just over 1.5 million buys.

Tyson Fury vs Oleksandr Usyk is one of the most-watched pay-per-view events in boxing history
3
Tyson Fury vs Oleksandr Usyk is one of the most-watched pay-per-view events in boxing historyCredit: Getty

Those numbers slot the undisputed heavyweight clash somewhere between No.9 Floyd Mayweather vs Miguel Cotto (1.5m) and No.8 Mike Tyson vs Peter McNeeley (1.55m) in the all-time PPV charts.

The report goes on to add that the vast majority of the Fury vs Usyk buys came from the United Kingdom, while the event also made $40m (£31.3m) in sponsorship and another $3m-plus (£2.3m) in ticket sales.

It is also reported that the event cost in the region of $120m (£93.9m).

Meanwhile, an estimated £95m worth of revenue was lost through illegal streams.

READ MORE ON BOXING

As per the , at least 20 million people illegally streamed the event instead of forking out the £24.99 UK fee.

Sky Sports, TNT Sports, and DAZN all bought the television rights in the United Kingdom but there were also 2,000 different streaming locations broadcasting the action illegally.

A DAZN spokesperson said of the findings: "Sports piracy is theft. DAZN invests a significant amount in combatting it, using technology to monitor the activity of users, and educating fans about the risks. 

"It may seem a victimless crime, but most illegal feeds are provided by criminal networks or carry the risk of phishing and identity theft.

Usyk vs Fury did similar numbers to Floyd Mayweather vs Miguel Cotto (2012)
3
Usyk vs Fury did similar numbers to Floyd Mayweather vs Miguel Cotto (2012)Credit: Getty
And Mike Tyson vs Peter McNeeley (1995)
3
And Mike Tyson vs Peter McNeeley (1995)Credit: Getty

"Our advice is don't risk the sport you care about, or your own data, by using illegal feeds."

Usyk was crowned the first undisputed heavyweight champion in 25 years via split decision in their inaugural encounter.

They are now set to run it back on December 21 after Fury activated the two-way rematch clause in their contract.

It is presently unclear whether their second fight will be for all four major sanctioning body belts again as the IBF seems intent on stripping Usyk of their title unless he fights mandatory challenger, Daniel Dubois, next.

Usyk recently put in a request with the IBF to grant him an exception, which is currently under consideration at the time of writing.

“We’re waiting for a decision to be made,” said Usyk's manager Egis Klimas on the IBF's pending decision.

“I think it’s more important for Tyson Fury now, not for Oleksandr. 

"Oleksandr, of course, is a two-time unified [champion at cruiserweight and heavyweight] and if the next fight is just for the three belts, I don’t think it’s going to be fair for either of the two guys. Either Tyson Fury or for Oleksandr. 

“But as far as importance, I think it’s more important for Team Fury to get this title. Imagine if Fury wins – he’s not going to be undisputed, so he is losing the chance. 

“The rematch, the clause, was so both guys had the chance to be undisputed. I hope the IBF are going to make the right decision.”

Boxing WhatsApp channel

Get the latest fight news, reaction and the best opinion from talkSPORT pundits in our

Follow our Boxing channel

Topics
cricket exchange